Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Veracity of Rebuttal Remarks Made by North Canton Law Director Unsupported by Public Records


Prepared Comments Made to
NORTH CANTON CITY COUNCIL
April 24, 2017
 

On February 27, 2017, I highlighted to City Council a multitude of actions which have violated the North Canton’s City Charter. 

The first violation I detailed as a direct violation of the City Charter was the approval of a variance at an August 5, 2015, meeting of the City’s Planning Commission with the City’s Law Director in attendance. 

From the minutes of Council’s February 27, 2017, meeting, Law Director Tim Fox immediately follows up my remarks with a rebuttal stating, “Mr. Osborne stated that the Planning Commission granted a variance for the cell tower. And clearly that did not occur.”

As is clearly described on page 5 and 6 of the minutes of the August 5, 2015, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission did in fact approve a variance for the cell tower.

In fact, the minutes of the Commission reflect the following dialogue: 

Commission Chairman Flechtner states,

“Question[?]. Do we need a third vote for the variance?” 

North Canton’s former Director of Permits and Development Bowles responds stating:
 
“No. You can approve it with it as presented…” 

Chairman Flechtner responds stating,

“So that would be a part of the motion to approve the site plan….”
 
The City of Canton and the Montabella Estates Homeowners Association also were well aware that North Canton’s Planning Commission had approved a variance for the cell tower. Each entity appealed the Planning Commission’s approval citing the fact that North Canton’s Planning Commission exceeded its authority under the City’s Charter when it approved this variance. I include copies of the appeals from each of those appellants. 

On September 22, 2015, an appeal was on the agenda for the meeting of the North Canton Zoning Board of Appeals. 

Prior to the Board’s hearing the appeal, Law Director Tim Fox addressed the Zoning  Board. From page 4 of the attached minutes of the September 22, 2015, meeting of ZBA, Mr. Fox states in part,  

“…The Planning Commission had stated at its meeting regarding a conditional use that it approved of a variance but it’s clear from the City’s Charter and its ordinances only this body, the Zoning and Building Standards Board of Appeals may hear a variance….” 

Mr. Fox clearly and purposely misled this public body as the North Canton Planning Commission did in fact approve a variance for the cell tower at the August 5, 2017, meeting of the Planning Commission. 

I believe this instance to be but a snapshot of the manner in which Mr. Fox handles his position as North Canton’s Law Director. 

I include with my remarks, the various documents I have cited. 

Every member of this Council should cast a critical eye as to the way the current Law Director spins and twists the facts, not only in this instance but often since he has taken on the role as North Canton’s Director of Law. 

If Law Director Tim Fox can find the need to twist and distort the facts in an effort to reign supreme over a citizen as myself, who regularly researches Council proceedings, what is he doing under far less scrutinized circumstances? 

I find Mr. Fox’s veracity to be highly questionable!!  

I ask that City Council end the reign of Law Director Tim Fox.
 

Thank you,
Chuck Osborne