Tuesday, April 19, 2016

April 18, 2016 - Special Council meeting followed by a Committee of the Whole Meeting

North Canton Residents and Anyone Having Interest in the Business of North Canton City Government:

Pasted below is a link to a video of the North Canton Special Council meeting followed by a Council of the Whole meeting.

 
Description of Video: 
April 18, 2016, – Special Council Meeting followed by a Council of the Whole Meeting: 
The video covers a Special Council meeting lasting about forty-three and one half minutes followed by a Committee of the Whole meeting which lasts approximately one hour and fifteen minutes. The video begins approximately five minutes before the Special Council meeting is called to order.  
Tonight’s meetings of North Canton City Council were not expected to run much more than an hour in length for the two meetings. The combined length of both meetings ran nearly two hours exhausting the battery of the camera. Typically, a battery pack is brought along to handle meetings that are expected to run long. Consequently, the last ten minutes of the meeting were not recorded. A lesson learned by this videographer.  
The agenda for the Special Council meeting consisted of 2nd Readings for two pieces of legislation:
·         Ordinance 33-2016 – Continuing two CRA agreements. One for LMD Property and a second for Reed Funeral Home. The agreements allow two corporations to continue to receive an abatement of taxes on their respective properties. LMD Realty, LTD is corporation owned by Bob DeHoff. Reed Funeral Home is a corporation owned by Dennis Reed.
·         Resolution 1-2016 – A resolution repealing and replacing Resolution 547-1963, which designated the City of North Canton as “The Dogwood City.” 
          5:00 minutes into the video, the Special Council meeting is called to order. 
          6:00 minutes into the video, North Canton Service Director Jim Davis introduces Walsh University Professor, Dr. Michael Dunphy, and his Chemistry students who, as a research project, are analyzing the salt content, along with other chemicals, of North Canton storm water. This presentation ended at 20:45 minutes. 
           20:45 minutes into the video, Council President Peters called for “Recognition of Visitors” and outlined the rules for speakers. 
           21:20 minutes into the video, the first speaker was Chuck Osborne.
 
          Mr. Osborne's remarks to City Council can be found at the following link:

 
          Council President Peters wasted no time calling out that my five minutes were up. Having literally only about 10-12 words to complete my presentation, I attempted to complete my presentation which I did. 
          My remarks to City Council generally do not paint Council in a good light and they are only too happy to make me pay a price for my well-researched remarks. Their treatment of me has grown more personal, hateful, and vindictive, especially under the current makeup of City Council. I am not treated equally as others who speak before Council and that is well known to all who have ever attended a North Canton City Council meeting. Most especially, Council's treatment of certain individuals is harsh and unreasonable.  
          Council President Peters had a melt-down at the City Council meeting of February 1, 2016, and was very heavy-handed with a North Canton senior citizen and threatened to have the police escort the senior citizen out of the Council Chamber. The Senior Citizen, stunned by the hostility of Council President Peters elected to leave out of disgust. 
          A week later at Council’s next meeting on February 8, 2016, Council President Peters begins the meeting apologizing for his own conduct at the previous Council meeting. Mr. Peter’s apology for his conduct at that February 8, 2016 meeting can be seen at 3:18 minutes into the video of that meeting which can be found at the following link:   
Returning to the current meeting being described:  
           27:00 minutes into the video, Miriam Baughman addresses City Council with her concerns on the proposed expansion of the City’s CRA Program. 
           31:35 minites into the video, Melanie Roll addresses City Council with her concerns on the proposed expansion of the City’s CRA Program. 
            36:45 minutes into the video, Dan Fonte, a Canto resident, follows up on a request he made to Council at a March 14, 2016, meeting asking that North Canton City Council pass a resolution in opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement, commonly referred to as the TPP Free Trade Agreement. 
           38:50 minutes into the video, Council President Peters feels the need to berate me for my attempt earlier in the meeting to finish the remaining 10-12 words left in my prepared remarks to Council. Mr. Peters follows up his public reprimand of me by asking if I would like to remove myself from the meeting.  
           I do not know why Mr. Peters would not just move on with the meeting after the public reprimand but he then began to bully me and me stare me down for a time, as if daring me or calling me out. At this point, I reacted by very quickly sticking my tongue out for a half-a-second. Mr. Peters then laughingly verbalizes my childish action on the record and then orders me out of the Council meeting.  
           Mr. Peters obviously was cocked and ready tonight to challenge me. Three times North Canton Police had come up during the meeting and circled around outside the Council Chamber. Clearly, Council President Peters had used his silent call button to summon Police each time. The Police Department is just below the Council Chambers. The Police did not see any disturbance and on each occasion and simply returned to their department.  
          In my opinion, Council President Peters was overly sensitive and overly harsh. Mr. Peters just could not stop himself. He had to keep egging the situation further and further until he himself overreacted and demanded I leave the Council meeting. Mr. Peters, in my mind, misused and abused his power in this situation for no valid reason. 
          At this point in the meeting, I am viewing the meeting for the first time directly from the video. 
          40:25 minutes into the video, the Special Council meeting continued until concluding at 43:35 minutes.  
          43:35 minutes into the video, the Committee of the Whole meeting is called to order. The agenda consisted of one item:
·         Continuing discussion of tabled Ordinance No. 32-2016, the expanded boundaries for the Community Reinvestment Area. 
          On being given the floor, Marcia Kiesling, Chairperson of Community and Economic Development, immediately motions for a vote to allow outside speakers to address City Council.  
          One speaker is from CT Consultants and I believe her name was Mrs. Hopkins. The second speaker was from Evaluation Services and his name was Dan Miller. 
           45:20 minutes into the video, Mrs. Hopkins begins her presentation stating that communities can’t afford to not put protections in place to protect older neighborhoods Mrs. Hopkins also stated that as Planners, we must do whatever it takes to assure that older communities remain competitive in the retail market. 
           Mrs. Hopkins also told Council that many times existing housing stock can’t be retrofitted to meet the needs of what homeowners are buying in the contemporary housing market. Mrs. Hopkins concluded her remarks at 1:05:05 minutes. 
           1:05:15 minutes into the video, Mr. Dan Miller explained that his background was mostly in appraisal work. Mr. Miller concluded his remarks at 1:32:50 minutes. 
            The video concludes at 1:41:04 minutes resulting in no video for approximately the remaining ten minutes of the meeting.  
Thank you,
Chuck Osborne
 

 

Monday, April 11, 2016

April 11, 2016 - North Canton City Council Meeting

North Canton Residents and Anyone Having Interest in the Business of North Canton City Government:

Pasted below is a link to a video of the North Canton City Council meeting held on Monday, April 11, 2016.

 
Description of Video: 
April 11, 2016, 2016 – City Council Meeting: 
The video covers a City Council meeting lasting about one hour and twenty minutes. The video begins approximately one and one half minutes before the meeting is called to order.  
The Council meeting was to be followed by an Executive Session which was not filmed as they are not open to the public.  
The stated purpose of the Executive Session was “…to consider the employment of a public employee.” This is the sixth Executive Session to be held since mid-January with the same stated purpose “…to consider the employment of a public employee. 
Councilmember Stephanie Werren was not present for roll call and failed to show for both the Council meeting and the Executive Session that followed. Her absence was excused and she will receive her Council salary despite her absence from the meeting.  
1:40 minutes into the video, the meeting is called to order. The Opening Prayer is given by Reverend Mel Lindberg followed by the pledge of Allegiance. 
4:40 minutes into the video, Council Roll Call is taken and Council votes to excuse Councilmember Stephanie Werren. This is followed by an introduction of a foreign exchange student from Germany who is doing an internship with the City. Council then approves the minutes of prior Council meetings. 
6:45 minutes into the video there is a call for Recognition of Visitors (referred to as Public Speaks). Six City residents speak: 
7:25 minutes into the video, City resident M.J. Albacete updates Council on his use of grant funds appropriated through City Council to teach school children the principles of geometry through art projects.  
10:45 minutes into the video, City resident Glenn Saylor presents his opposition on Councils proposal to remove the North Canton Tagline “The Dogwood City” which has existed since 1963 and now is to be struck down by Resolution No. 1-2016.  
16:00 minutes into the video, City resident Chuck Osborne presents research that reveals serious practical and moral questions for taxpayers and the City’s School District regarding North Canton’s CRA tax abatement program. Mr. Osborne finishes his remarks by pointing out that a local millionaire developer is receiving an annual abatement of $59,129 for fifteen years on a brand new 40-unit apartment complex on North Main Street. Mr. Osborne presents a letter to Mayor Held asking that the Mayor ask for the resignation of Eric Bowles who approved that abatement. 
21:15 minutes into the video, Miriam Baughman presents her concerns regarding the City’s CRA program.
23:30 minutes into the video, City resident Melanie Roll presents her concerns regarding the City’s CRA program. 
28:30 minutes into the video, a resident of Akron (did not catch the name) gave his views on the CRA program.  
29:50 minutes into the video, North Canton’s Superintendent of Permits and Inspection, Eric Bowles defends his authorization of a 100 percent tax abatement for fifteen years to a well-known millionaire builder/developer. Mr. Bowles references an ordinance passed seventeen years ago (Section 7 of Ordinance 22-99) stating the ordinance gives him the authority to approve property tax exemptions. 
Mr. Bowles concludes his rebuttal by saying he has been operating the City’s CRA program properly.  
The abatement given to a local millionaire developer has resulted in annual property tax exemption of $59,129 per year for fifteen years which will result in a total tax exemption over that term of a minimum of $886,935.  
Mr. Bowles did not challenge the tax abatement figures I presented. And surprisingly, Mr. Bowles did not seem embarrassed or apologetic that he has given away millions dollars desperately needed by North Canton City Schools. North Canton  City Officials seemed quite fine with the loss of nearly $1.4 million of public money. 
31:50 minutes into the video, Council begins the legislative portion of the meeting. Council votes on six pieces of legislation. Three ordinances were passed as “Emergency” legislation. One received its 3rd Reading and two ordinances received their 1st Reading. 
32:30 minutes into the video, Council President Peters acknowledges that Councilmember Werren is not present to present legislation (Ordinance No. 23-2016) she has lobbied for. 
33:25 minutes into the video, two CRA agreements are introduced for approval. Both agreements are tax abatements for two businesses, one owned by another local millionaire. 
49:45 minutes into the video, final reports are heard from members of City Council and other City officials in attendance. As they go around the room, each one speaks in glowing terms of Eric Bowles after I had urged Mayor Held to ask for the resignation of Mr. Bowles for his inept approval of a property tax abatement resulting in a tax savings of nearly ONE MILLION DOLLARS to a local millionaire builder developer. 
51:45 minutes into the video, Councilmember Griffith announces the creation of a committee to find a replacement for the City’s outgoing Finance Director. 
53:30 minutes into the video, Councilmember Cerreta talks about CRA tax abatements and to me it is clear that he has no understanding of property tax abatements. And as best as I can follow him, Mr. Cerreta attempts to justify the continued practice of abating property taxes. Mr. Cerreta does acknowledge that the main purpose of the CRA is directed toward the improvement of existing housing and yet he continues to justify the abatement of new construction.  
55:10 minutes into the video, Councilmember Foltz offers his praise of Eric Bowles. Surprisingly, Mr. Foltz appears to gloss over the million dollar tax abatement made to a local millionaire explaining the removal of the mobile homes that had existed at that location earlier were worth the abatement of taxes.  
59:50 minutes into the video, Council President Peters speaks in support of Eric Bowles.
 
1:07:35 minutes into the video, City Administrator Mike Grimes offers praise of Eric Bowles.
1:11:00 minutes into the video, Mayor Held addresses comments made about the City’s CRA and other incentives used by the City to bring business to the City. And then expounds on the great work of Eric Bowles. 
1:19:25 minutes into the video, City Engineer Jim Benekos comments on Eric Bowles. 
1:20:25 minutes into the video, the City Council meeting is concluded. City Council immediately reconvenes and votes to go into Executive Session.  
The video continues to run until 1:24:40 minutes as Councilmembers go behind closed doors for their Executive Session.  
Thank you,
Chuck Osborne
 

 

Saturday, April 9, 2016

April 6, 2016 - North Canton Planning Commission Meeting

North Canton Residents and Anyone Having Interest in the Business of North Canton City Government:

Pasted below is a link to a video of the North Canton Planning Commission meeting held on Wednesday, April 6, 2016.



Description of Video: 

April 6, 2016 – North Canton Planning Commission meeting: 

The video covers a North Canton Planning Commission meeting that lasts approximately thirty-seven minutes and commences approximately two minutes before the meeting is called to order.  

Per Section 3.07(2) of the North Canton City Charter, the City’s Planning Commission is composed of five voting members and two- non-voting members. The City’s Director of Administration and a selected member of Council are mandated to serve as non-voting members and are required to attend all meetings of the Commission. 

Councilmember Marcia Kiesling is Council’s selected member to attend all meetings of the City’s Planning Commission. Typically, Marcia Kiesling fails to attend meetings of the Planning Commission and tonight was no exception. 

The Planning Commission was missing its Chairman, Dennis Flechtner, for this meeting and so the meeting was conducted with only four members present, with Vice-Chairman Tom Serra filling in for the absent Mr. Flechtner.   

The announced meeting agenda for the Planning Commission meeting consisted of one item for discussion:  

·        A request by IRG/Maple Street Commerce to vacate two City streets – specifically:

-         A portion of Orchard Street NE, from Witwer Street to Hower Street.

-         A portion of Orchard Street NE, from Orchard Street to Main Street. 

3:00 minutes into the video, Vice-Chairman Serra states the first order of
business is the approval of the minutes of the Commission’s last meeting held back on December 9, 2015, and makes a motion for approval of the minutes. 
Recently appointed member of the Planning Commission member,
Gary Fry expresses some reservations in approving the minutes as presented explaining that the minutes of the previous meeting may not be complete in terms of his participation at that meeting.

 
4:40 minutes into the video, Mr. Fry makes a motion that the vote to approve the minutes as presented be tabled.
 
I applaud Mr. Fry for his actions. 

I detail this in my description of this video because the rules of order were
not followed at this point in the meeting.  

When there is a motion made on the floor, proper procedure calls for another member to second the motion. If the motion is seconded, the Chair restates the motion saying, “It is moved and seconded to ….”  

At this point, members have the right to debate or discuss the motion.  

When the discussion is finished, the Chair puts the motion to a vote stating, “All those in favor say ‘Aye.’” Those opposed say ‘No’.”  

This did not happen. The rules of order for voting on a motion that had been made were not followed.  

North Canton’s Law Director, Tim Fox, was in attendance and at one point offered some advice to Mr. Fry on how he could review the audio of the meeting for needed corrections. Sadly, Law Director Fox failed to provide any guidance to Commission members to assure procedural rules were followed in the meeting.  

 In regards to the request to vacate portions of Orchard and Witwer, the
Planning Commission had previously ruled against vacation in an earlier meeting several months ago.  

          19:40 minutes into the video, input from residents in opposition to the closure of the two streets began. Brian Foltz, an East Maple Street resident, spoke in opposition to the vacation of the requested streets. Nick Gang, a Hower Street resident presented his concerns followed by Chuck Osborne. 

          33:25 minutes into the video, Vice-Chairman Serra asks for a motion on the requests to vacate. Commission member Jerry Geib makes a motion to vacate portions of the two streets and member Gary Fry seconds the motion. 

          36:10 minutes into the video, Vice-Chairman Serra repeats the motion now before the Commission and calls for a roll call vote. The vote was unanimous, 4 – 0, to recommend that Council vacate the streets as requested. 

          37:00 minutes into the video, the meeting is concluded. The video continues to run until 37:50 minutes. 

Thank you,
Chuck Osborne

Monday, April 4, 2016

April 4, 2016 - North Canton Council of the Whole meeting

North Canton Residents and Anyone Having Interest in the Business of North Canton City Government:


Pasted below is a link to a video of the North Canton City Council meeting held on Monday, April 4, 2016.


 
Description of Video: 
April 4, 2016 – North Canton Committee of the Whole meeting: 
The video covers a North Canton Committee of the Whole meeting lasting approximately fifty-four and one half minutes and commences approximately two minutes before the meeting is called to order.  
The announced meeting agenda for the Committee of the Whole consisted of three items for discussion:
1)    Continued discussion of tabled Ordinance No. 32-2016, establishing a City-wide Community Reinvestment Area (CRA) and designating a housing officer to administer the program.
2)      Discussion on the elimination of the Dogwood tag line from City property.
3)      City Engineer Jim Benekos gives a presentation on the East Maple Street Improvements Project called Westgate at Walsh University.   
        
          2:15 minutes into the video until 21:20 minutes, Councilmember Marcia 
Kiesling leads discussion as Chairman of Economic Development on the proposed ordinance to expand the City’s CRA to include virtually the entire City. 
          At last week’s Council meeting, members of Council were stunned to learn that two CRAs created in 1999 and in 2001 allowed abatement of property taxes on new construction. Council learned from Director of Permits and Inspection Eric Bowles that approximately four years ago, a property owner sold off a lot on Harmon Street and the purchaser of the lot built a brand new home and qualified for a 100 percent abatement of property taxes on the new home for fifteen years under the previously designated CRA boundaries. 
           I do not know why Director Bowles waited all these years to alert Council to this glaring loophole created in previous CRA legislation but it appears from the discussion that Council does not want to allow widespread misuse of the CRA program to mushroom and allow more new construction to qualify for abatement of property taxes.
          In an effort to thwart further abatement of property taxes on new construction, Council is omitting areas of the City where large numbers of new construction would obviously be underway such as in the Sanctuary, Monticello, and the seven new homes proposed for construction on Summit Avenue.  
           Word was also last week leaked last week that Waterside Park will not be developed as commercial property but will be developed into apartments. Consequently, Council intends to also exclude Waterside Park from inclusion in the expanded CRA. 
            Council is exploring if isolated scattered lots in the City could also be excluded from tax abatement on new construction.    
           21:20 minutes into the video until 27:15 minutes, Ordinance, Rules and Claims Committee member Mark Cerreta leads discussion on a proposal to eliminate the tag line, Dogwood City, from being used in the future on City property. 
           27:15 minutes into the video until 43:40 minutes, Finance and Property Chairman Dan Griffith introduces City Engineer Jim Benekos who gives a presentation on planned improvements on East Maple Street in the area of Walsh University that is called Westgate at Walsh University. 
           I might add some background at this point: On February 8, 2016, City Council passed Ordinance No. 14-2016 appropriating $250,000 for the East Maple Street improvements (Westgate at Walsh University project). The cost of the project has now increased to $410,000 and City Council intends to amend the previous legislation for the higher cost at its next legislative meeting. 
           The presentation by City Engineer Benekos was difficult to follow but piecing together remarks made by Mr. Benekos tonight and last week, it appears that traffic control is adding $150,000 to the cost of the project.  
           Councilmember Mark Cerreta seemed astounded at the increased costs of the project and asked what the City was getting for the increased costs. Engineer Benekos said the grassy median was not part of this project nor were sidewalks. 
           All I could understand was that the current curb-cut currently in use by Walsh University is going to be relocated.  
           With traffic control such a large cost of the project, I am surprised no member of Council asked how long East Maple Street would be under construction. No Councilmember asked! 
           43:40 minutes into the video, Councilmember Kiesling brings the discussion back to the CRA discussion until 46:30 minutes. 
           46:30 minutes into the video, the agenda of the meeting is amended to include a discussion about upcoming collective bargaining agreements. This discussion ends at 52:00 minutes. 
          52:20 minutes into the video, the meeting is concluded.  
          The video continues to run until 54:22 minutes as Council adjourns for an Executive Session. Executive Sessions of City Council are not open to the public, and the video ends. 
          I will add that the stated purpose of tonight’s Executive Session was “…to consider the employment of a public employee.” This is the fifth straight Executive Session held in the last three months with the stated purpose “…to consider the employment of a public employee.”
 
Thank you,
Chuck Osborne